Rabble Rousing Random Ramblings

March 12, 2008

First, she wanted an airport in Amaravati, at a cost of at least Rs. 400 crores.

Now, she wants an Indian Institute of Technology to be setup in Amaravati, of all places. If that isn't bad enough, she wants it to be an exclusive women-only institute (Link via Nitin).

Of course, these demands have nothing to do with the fact that it was her constituency. They're aimed at overall development of Vidarbha.

This is the whole problem with making chamchas/chamchis as presidents or governors. SM Krishna moved to Maharashtra as governor shortly after the 2004 elections. Now he's back in active politics. Sushil Kumar Shinde was made governor of Andhra Pradesh in 2004, but obviously the office wasn't to his liking. He quit in 2006 and is now a Union cabinet minister. ND Tiwari is the current Andhra Pradesh governor, but it wasn't too long ago that he was the Uttaranchal Chief Minister.

I'm fairly sure there're several such instances in the past where politicians have been given gubernatorial postings as a sop or to ensure they don't continue making trouble for the party.

There should be a constitutional bar on people being appointed governors within 5 years of holding any sort of executive position in their party or in government.

Labels: agriculture, airports, education, governor, iit, india, pratibha patil, president

Posted @ 12:46 PM

Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - | | Tweet ]

Add/View 0 comment(s)

December 13, 2007

What to do with 400 cr? Build an airport for the President

Amravati, in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, is all set to get a new airport, with a budget of Rs. 400 crores. But of course, it is just merely a coincidence that the incumbent President, Ms. Pratibha Patil, considers Amravati home by virtue of her marriage to Devisingh Ransingh Shekhawat, a former mayor of Amravati. The Rashtrapati Bhavan is very quick to deny any sort of link.

Vidarbha district is where, by government estimates & registered case counts, there have been nearly 2500 suicides from 2006, over 1000 of them this year. While I am all for infrastructure development, it seems very clear to me that the farmers in the region would probably benefit far more if the money was spent on efforts to improve roads, rail network, educating them on agricultural practices, better quality irrigation, educating the farmers to possibly consolidate their tiny land holdings to get greater returns for their efforts, helping them pick the right crops to plant in the right season and thereby reduce their dependence on rainfall, etc. Not 'packages' or subsidies. Certainly not an airport!

Labels: agriculture, airports, farmers, india, pratibha patil, president, vidarbha

Posted @ 5:10 PM

Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - | | Tweet ]

Add/View 0 comment(s)

November 23, 2007

Just frisk 'em all for the sake of better security

There's a totally unwanted fracas going on regarding the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security decision to frisk India's armed forces chiefs at airports.

Undoubtedly, what riles the armed forces (and former defence personnel) is the fact that they are frisked (and by implication, untrusted) while a lot of politicians, bureaucrats and others in the SPG umbrella are exempted from frisking (and by implication, trusted).

My solution is to frisk everyone, from President to peon. In the interest of security. Nothing else. No-one should be trusted. What prevents someone from misusing his/her exemption from being frisked to do something illegal and dangerous? What prevents a terrorist who knows one of those who're exempted from frisking to use them as a messenger for a dangerous illegal act?

I've travelled by some of the lower cost airlines a few times in the last few months from Bangalore, including a trip around 10 days ago. It was shocking to see the laxity with which the airline personnel (at the check-in counter) and the security personnel (at the entrance, security check area, etc.) were doing their job.

The rules mandate that:

At the entrance, passengers with a valid ticket should be asked for proof of identity.
At the check-in counter, holders of e-tickets should be asked for proof of identity.
You are not allowed to carry batteries on your person or as part of the hand-baggage.

None of the rules above were followed. The security guard at the entrance did not verify if I actually had a proof of identity when I produced my e-ticket. Surely it is not rocket science to produce a print-out claiming it to be an e-ticket. The personnel at the check-in counter (I was travelling by IndiGo) did not ask me for my identity proof despite the fact that I had an e-ticket. I was carrying just one unit of hand-baggage, which had a digital camera (with batteries inside) and had a spare set of AA batteries in my pocket. The security guard at the security check area told me I couldn't take the batteries in my pocket. He asked me if they were spares, to which I replied in the affirmative. He let me carry them on my person.

Overall, it was amazing how those responsible for security at airports and in aircraft shirk their duties, putting everyone around in peril. If the same attitude towards security continues, I would not be surprised if a serious disaster in the form of a terror attack occured. By then, it would be too late.

A simple adherence to the rules, by airline & security personnel as well as by passengers, would minimize the risk of disaster. It is likely that passengers will spend an extra 10 minutes in the queue, airline personnel at the check-in counter will spend an extra 10 minutes on the job and the security check folks will take 10 minutes extra to complete the necessary checks on all passengers, but those are minor irritants taking into account what could be prevented.

Labels: airlines, airports, aviation, india, security, terrorism

Posted @ 11:58 AM

Did you like the post? [ Subscribe to the blog feed - | | Tweet ]

Add/View 0 comment(s)