$BlogRSDURL$>
My tweets
|
||||
Site Feed -
![]()
My other writings Badri's Tamil thoughts Ganesh's Happily Haphazard Nitin's Acorn Prabhu's Pethals Raghu the reluctant Delhiite Samanth's blahg Sankhya the busy idler Srini the movie critic
|
Breaking news: Supreme Court to deliver Bhopal gas disaster judgment in 2084
Yesterday, a local court in Bhopal convicted the 7 accused in the Bhopal gas tragedy case, sent them to jail for 2 years and later gave them bail. Well, as you say, Goyal, this tragedy happened 26 years ago, and it was a terrible tragedy, one of the worst industrial accidents in human history, and we certainly hope that the verdict brings some closure to the families of the victims of this tragedy.In other words, we don't give a damn about what you want. This then presented a wonderful opportunity for the Indian media to go berserk, pointing out 'double standards' by the USA government when it came to the British Petroleum oil spill and the Bhopal gas tragedy. So, while British Petroleum will be forced to pay up billions of dollars in penalties for the damage caused to the environment & businesses, victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy would get something like Rs. 50,000 each in addition to the pleasure of living with the after-effects of the gas poisoning. Yet, they're missing a major point. The US is stalling or denying requests for Warren Anderson's extradition because it wants to protect it's citizen from criminal proceedings in a different jurisdiction. In contrast, India's governments settled for a compensation of USD 470 million, around 14% of the original claim of USD 3.3 billion. Warren Anderson was let off on bail, and there's no chance he's going to enjoy a holiday at Agra (except in disguise perhaps). It is unknown how many palms (belonging to politicians, investigators, policemen & bureaucrats) were greased. India's legal system watered down the charges from culpable homicide to criminal negligence. It seems like 'Tort law' is a foreign concept for the Indian judicial system. It took over a quarter-of-a-century to deliver a verdict, in a local court at that! There's no doubt that both parties will appeal. I expect that the appeal will reach the Supreme Court by 2050, and a final judgment will be delivered close to midnight on 2 December 2084, commemorating the centenary of the disaster. When our governments and courts can't protect our citizens, why should we complain if other governments stand up for their citizens, regardless of whether the accused is at fault or not? Labels: accident, bhopal, farce, india, judgement, legal, supreme court Ramalinga Raju for Warren Anderson?
Shortly after the former Satyam founder-chairman Ramalinga Raju admitted to cooking the books to the tune of over Rs. 7000 crores, class action suits were filed in the USA. A class action suit is sort of like a PIL, except that PILs in India can be filed only against state or public bodies while class action suits can be filed against everyone, including private companies and individuals. In addition, someone filing a class action suit must necessarily have suffered financial/legal injury. As a result, it could be likely that Ramalinga Raju will have to face trial in US courts. I guess that's part of being a listed company on US stock exchanges. Labels: accident, accounting, bhopal, india, satyam, scam
To me, it seems like Bhopal 1984 is getting worldwide attention now, 20 years too late. When you do a search for a city's name, typically you expect to see results related to tourism/events happening there. Not so for Bhopal.
The US administrative department has turned down India's request for the extradition of Warren Anderson, who was CEO of Union Carbide when the Bhopal gas disaster took place.
Some of the sites linked in my rants may require registration/subscription. Links within my ramblings open in a new window.
Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents. All opinions expressed are mine alone. My employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here. All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. I do not intend to infringe on any copyright. Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to the readers.
|
![]() |