<$BlogRSDURL$>
My tweets

    Site Feed - Site Feed

    My other writings
    Cricket 24 x 7
    Jaagruthi
    Yahoo! 360
    Mayajaal
    My Bloglines
    My 43 things
    My LinkedIn
    My Facebook Profile On Orkut

    Mail me
    About me
    FlickrFlickr Feed

    Yahoo! Search



    Baakiyon ke blog
    Badri's Tamil thoughts
    Ganesh's Happily Haphazard
    Nitin's Acorn
    Prabhu's Pethals
    Raghu the reluctant Delhiite
    Samanth's blahg
    Sankhya the busy idler
    Srini the movie critic

    Creative Commons License
    Rabble Rousing Random Ramblings by S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

    February 12, 2010
     

    Parochialism pays

    The state government does nothing when political party 'leaders' make statements claiming that 'Marathi Manoos' should get priority in jobs, education, toilet queues, buses, etc. in Mumbai. Previous governments did nothing when those leaders successfully managed to get a book on Shivaji banned.

    I've never really been a Shahrukh Khan fan except for admiring the way he came into the film industry without any sort of film dynasty background, played anti-hero characters and then moved on and started playing hero roles.

    On this occasion though, he has got it spot on. We can always debate on whether Pakistani players were ill-treated at the IPL auction. Yet, his expressing an opinion on the (non)selection of Pakistani players resulted in his patriotism being questioned and threats that movie theatres in Mumbai wouldn't be allowed screen his new movie 'My Name Is Khan'.

    What stops the Maharashtra government from jailing Bal Thackeray, Uddhav Thackeray, Raj Thackeray, Sanjay Raut, and indeed anyone else who threatened violence (or threw up their hands claiming that they couldn't control mobs who protested). Treat them as common criminals or rowdies. They should be thrown in jail without any of the drama around them volunteering arrest, being placed under house arrest, taken into preventive custody or coming out on bail.

    How likely is that to happen when it is fairly well established that parochialism pays, and a general culture of intolerance pays really rich dividends?!

    Here are 3 examples, over the last 25 years or so:

    • Congress (I) came to power at the centre despite organizing and implementing the anti-Sikh riots in 1984
    • The Shiv Sena came to power in Maharashtra a couple of years after organizing and carrying out riots in the aftermath of the demolition of Babri Masjid and the bomb blasts in Bombay
    • The BJP came to power in Gujarat within a year of the riots of 2002



    Some of the sites linked in my rants may require registration/subscription. Links within my ramblings open in a new window.
    Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents.
    All opinions expressed are mine alone. My employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. I do not intend to infringe on any copyright.
    Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to the readers.


    Previous Posts
    Selective force-feeding

    Does a Telangana state make sense?

    Thumbi vaa to Gumm summ gumm

    How the collective wisdom of our leaders gets exhi...

    An austerity suggestion for the Indian government

    Amazing phishing attempt for PayPal

    Delhi-∞

    China's national newspaper took a while, didn't it...

    Can North Korea withdraw from the United Nations?

    Too early to cheer for 'queer'?

    This page is powered by Blogger.