My tweets

    Site Feed - Site Feed

    My other writings
    Cricket 24 x 7
    Yahoo! 360
    My Bloglines
    My 43 things
    My LinkedIn
    My Facebook Profile On Orkut

    Mail me
    About me
    FlickrFlickr Feed

    Yahoo! Search

    Baakiyon ke blog
    Badri's Tamil thoughts
    Ganesh's Happily Haphazard
    Nitin's Acorn
    Prabhu's Pethals
    Raghu the reluctant Delhiite
    Samanth's blahg
    Sankhya the busy idler
    Srini the movie critic

    Creative Commons License
    Rabble Rousing Random Ramblings by S Jagadish is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

    February 28, 2003


    In the last couple of days, I've read reports of Venkiah Naidu (BJP chief) and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (the Art of Living foundation chap) exhorting Muslims to give away the disputed land in Ayodhya to Hindus as a mark of brotherhood and friendship so that the squabbles and disputes (obviously they wouldn't add words like rioting, killings, terror etc.) over the temple/mosque. This really baffles me. Why cant they ask Hindus to give up ownership claims to the disputed area? Why can't they ask the Hindus (mind you, they claim that all real Hindus want the temple to be built there. I don't qualify, I'm an agnostic) to relinquish attempts to take control of the land? Surely brotherhood/friendship etc. cannot be one-way, can it? What is really painful is the way we're forced to use words like disputed area/territory etc. We use this in the context of say Aksai Chin or Pakistan occupied Kashmir etc. But applying those words to a place which is very much in India, whose accession to India can never be disputed, now that is really ridiculous, isn't it?

    Yesterday was one year since the massacre at Godhra. I was stupefied when during a discussion on a news channel, one of the speakers (from the BJP, obviously), said "Why can't we forget what happened at Godhra and afterwards? We should move on. The Gujarat government is giving incentives for villages which don't see riots by providing a Rs. 1 lakh prize on an annual basis.". No self-respecting individual with the least sense would subscribe to this. While it is true that sometimes we're too taken in by what happened in the past and don't focus on the current and on the future, this isn't one of those situations. Why can't the same argument be applied when the Babri masjid was destroyed? Surely it was done (planned or part of mob fury) because those who were responsible for fanning the flames of hate kept harping on the fact that nearly 400 odd years ago, the Mughal emperor Babar demolished Lord Rama's birthplace and built a mosque over it. So the BJP wants us to forget what happened one year ago, but was guilty of asking their followers to not forget what happened 400 odd years ago? Double standards, me thinks.


    Some of the sites linked in my rants may require registration/subscription. Links within my ramblings open in a new window.
    Some of the links may now be broken/not take you to the expected report since the original content providers may have archived/removed the contents.
    All opinions expressed are mine alone. My employers (past, present or future) are in no way connected to the opinions expressed here.
    All pictures, photographs used are copyrights of the original owners. I do not intend to infringe on any copyright.
    Pictures and photographs are used here to merely accentuate and enhance the content value to the readers.

    Previous Posts
    Politics A portrait of Veer Savarkar is to be unve...

    Politics Is the NAM relevant any more? Among the m...

    Politics The rabid Hindutva folks are upping th...

    Politics Getting tired of the government's repeate...

    This page is powered by Blogger.